By Samuel Wrest
Industrial action in China entered uncharted territory last year. Labor unrest was previously confined for the most part to the manufacturing and construction sectors – the traditional linchpins of China’s growth. In 2016, however, it spread into the retail and service sectors, with strike action doubling in the former and growing by a fifth in the latter.When combined with incidents in the transport sector – which continued its upwards surge by a 25 percent increase – labor strikes in these three sectors outweighed those in manufacturing for the first time.
The increase in industrial action in these three industries is indicative of the changing nature of the Chinese economy, which is transitioning from one powered by manufacturing and exports to one reliant on consumption and services. However, it is also a sign of the deeper problems with labor unrest that exist in China’s workforce.
As in previous years, strikes in 2016 were organized by the workers themselves and not through the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) – the only trade union that is legally allowed to exist in the country – highlighting the gap in employee representation that currently exists across all industries in China.
Current law on trade unions
The Trade Union Law of the People’s Republic of China is the key piece of legislation on trade union organization. It states that 25 or more employees must be allowed to form an Enterprise Trade Union (ETU); a component part of the wider Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-led ACFTU. If the number of employees falls short of the required 25, they have the option of forming a “basic-level” trade union committee.
If an ETU has been formed, their employer must pay two percent of its workforce’s wages to the ACFTU, ostensibly to support its employees and the local ETU’s activities. These activities are loosely defined in the Trade Union Law.They include staff education, protecting the property of the enterprise and State, making “rational” proposals and technical renovations, and vocational training outside of work hours.Notably absent from the Trade Union Law is the right of union members to strike – a cornerstone of trade unions in the West. Additionally, once formed, management of ETUs is predominantly decided not by the workers, but by the company itself, which has often resulted in worker concerns not being put on the negotiating table. These issues have contributed to the trend of workers organizing and striking independently in China.
Obligations of foreign companies
Foreign-invested entities (FIEs) are subject to all provisions of the Trade Union Law, but there is often more pressure placed on them to unionize than domestic companies. The reason for this is twofold: there are a massive amount of FIEs in China offering competitive wages which translates into comparatively higher payments from them to the ACFTU However, there is also a perceived risk of FIEs westernizing their employees.Unionization is seen as a means of countering this westernization, with the ETUs acting as a channel for the CCP to keep in touch with the country’s workforce.
Considerations for labor relations
China has a stated aim of unionizing 90 percent of its workforce, but its goal is not to uphold workers’ rights. Rather, the modus operandi of the AFCTU is to ensure that the country’s labor force runs smoothly and in line with CCP targets. The reality is quite the opposite. In addition to industrial action spreading to new industries, the first half of 2016 saw strikes and protests rise almost 20 percent over the previous year, with the construction and transportation sectors hit hardest.
While this slowed in the second half of the year, 2016 closed with employees at Walmart – which unionized 10 years ago – staging a series of coordinated strikes across the US retailer’s numerous Chinese outlets, underscoring how unionization with the ACFTU in its present form isn’t a safeguard against employee unrest for foreign companies.
Keegan Elmer, a Labor Researcher at the China Labor Bulletin, told Asia Briefing, “Recent strikes at major multinationals like Coca Cola, Sony and Danone all showed that workers were willing to sit down with management long before they walked off the job. Workers are ready for bargaining, and companies can do a lot to help China’s labor relations bring about sustainable, mutually beneficial engagement between workers and employers through real collective bargaining.”
Foreign companies should therefore consider implementing their own policies that afford employees collective bargaining power. Observers of the Walmart strikes noted that the US retailer’s lack of basic collective bargaining rights was at the heart of its problem, indicating that an open internal channel with worker representatives would go a long way to ensuring employee satisfaction and preventing disruption.
About the author: This article was first published on www.dezshira.com. Since its establishment in 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates has been guiding foreign clients through Asia’s complex regulatory environment and assisting them with all aspects of legal, accounting, tax, internal control, HR, payroll, and audit matters. As a full-service consultancy with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India, and ASEAN, we are your reliable partner for business expansion in this region and beyond.